[R] CVPR rebuttal advice needed

Hello,

I received 3 CVPR reviews: 2× Borderline Accept and 1× Weak Reject with confidence 4,3,3.

Both borderline reviewers explicitly state that the method is novel, technically sound, and that they would increase their score if the concerns are addressed.

The weak reject is not based on technical correctness, but mainly on a perceived venue-fit issue; the reviewer also mentions they are not an expert in the domain and are open to changing their recommendation, especially if other reviewers disagree. Actually, the paper’s topic is explicitly listed in the CVPR CFP.

No reviewer raises fundamental flaws or correctness issues.

Based on your experience, is this a situation where a focused rebuttal can realistically change the outcome?