[D] ICML26 LLM Review Policy

ICML26 introduced a review type selection, where the author can decide whether LLMs can be used during their paper review, according to these two policies:

• Policy A (Conservative): Use of LLMs for reviewing is strictly prohibited.
• Policy B (Permissive): Allowed: Use of LLMs to help understand the paper and related works, and polish reviews. Submissions can be fed to privacy-compliant* LLMs. Not allowed: Ask LLMs about strengths/weaknesses, ask to suggest key points for the review, suggest an outline for the review, or write the full review By “privacy-compliant”, we refer to LLM tools that do not use logged data for training and that place limits on data retention. This includes enterprise/institutional subscriptions to LLM APIs, consumer subscriptions with an explicit opt-out from training, and self-hosted LLMs. (We understand that this is an oversimplification.)*

I’m struggling to decide which one to select, any tips?